tradingview to mt5 bridge

Short answer: as of July 2026 there are three working ways to bridge TradingView alerts into MT4/MT5 execution — (1) a managed cloud bridge like PineConnector, (2) your own webhook server using the MetaTrader5 Python package or an MQL5 Expert Advisor, and (3) a self-hosted commercial bridge EA such as TradingConnector. MT5 has no inbound webhook of its own, so something always has to sit in the middle, receive TradingView's POST request, and turn it into a broker order. Below I compare all three on cost, latency, coding effort and control. In my 8 years building Pine Script strategies and MetaTrader bridges for clients across 14+ countries, the most common bridge failure I'm asked to debug isn't latency — it's symbol naming. TradingView fires an alert for EURUSD; the broker feed actually calls it EURUSD.pro or EURUSD.x, so the order silently rejects with error 4106. Every method below lives or dies on details like that. Why you can't point a TradingView alert straight at MT5 MetaTrader 5 is a desktop terminal that speaks its own protocol to your broker. It has no inbound webhook listener — you cannot paste your MT5 login into a TradingView alert and have trades appear. Every working solution therefore needs a piece in the middle that does three jobs: Receives TradingView's HTTP POST (the webhook). Parses the alert message (usually JSON). Places the order inside MT4/MT5, through either the Python API or an Expert Advisor. The three methods differ only in who runs that middle piece: a paid service, your own code, or a commercial EA you install yourself. First, the TradingView side (same for all three) Before any bridge works, your TradingView account needs webhook alerts enabled. Two hard requirements as of July 2026: A paid plan. Webhook URLs unlock on the Essential tier (about $14.95/month billed annually) and are included on every plan above it. The free Basic plan cannot send webhooks at all. Two-factor authentication enabled. TradingView only permits webhook alerts on accounts with 2FA switched on. A few technical limits worth knowing: TradingView only posts to ports 80 and 443, cancels any request that takes longer than three seconds to respond, doesn't support IPv6, and caps alerts at 15 triggers per 3 minutes before auto-disabling them. It sends from four fixed IPs (52.89.214.238, 34.212.75.30, 54.218.53.128, 52.32.178.7) if you need to allowlist them. One Pine Script detail that saves real money: fire your webhook on bar close, not intrabar, or you'll get repainting entries and duplicate fills. Here's a clean Pine Script v6 alert payload: //@version6 indicator("TV to MT5 Bridge Signal", overlay true) fast ta.ema(close, 9) slow ta.ema(close, 21) longSig ta.crossover(fast, slow) shortSig ta.crossunder(fast, slow) if longSig alert('{"action":"buy","symbol":"EURUSD","risk":"1"}', alert.freq_once_per_bar_close) if shortSig alert('{"action":"sell","symbol":"EURUSD","risk":"1"}', alert.freq_once_per_bar_close) If the difference between alert.freq_once_per_bar and alert.freq_once_per_bar_close isn't second nature yet, read my breakdown of Pine Script alert frequencies — it's the number-one cause of "my bridge double-entered" tickets. And if the signal itself repaints, fix that first with my Pine Script repainting guide; no bridge can rescue a signal that lies on historical bars. Method 1 — Managed cloud bridge (PineConnector) This is the no-code route. You install a small Expert Advisor once, paste a licence ID, and the service's cloud relay handles the webhook. PineConnector is the best-known option in 2026 — run by Nautilion Pte Ltd in Singapore, it reports 66,000+ traders across 120+ countries and 167M+ signals processed, with typical latency under one second. Its current pricing (annual billing, which saves roughly 33%): Starter — 1 account: $26/mo billed annually ($312/yr), or $39/mo month-to-month. Advanced — up to 3 accounts: $53/mo annually ($632/yr), or $79/mo monthly. Professional — up to 10 accounts: $106/mo annually ($1,272/yr), or $159/mo monthly. There's a 14-day free trial (no card, full Advanced access). Because the webhook is processed in PineConnector's Azure cloud, you don't leave TradingView or a browser open — only MetaTrader has to run, ideally on a VPS that allows DLL imports (Windows Server 2016/2019/2022 or Windows 10/11). Two features solve the naming problem above: Symbol Mapping (map TradingView's EURUSD to your broker's EURUSD.x) and Signal Authentication (a secret key so only your alerts execute). A common alternative, PickMyTrade (around $50/month), leans toward futures/Tradovate rather than being MT5-first, so for pure MT4/MT5, PineConnector stays my default. Not sure which tier or method fits your strategy and broker? Message me on WhatsApp at +91 77352 68199 — send your strategy and broker, and I'll tell you within minutes whether a managed bridge or a custom build is the smarter spend. Method 2 — Your own webhook server (Python + MetaTrader5, or MQL5 EA) If you can code, you can cut the monthly fee down to just a VPS. The idea: run a tiny web server that receives TradingView's POST and places the trade. Two flavours. Python + the MetaTrader5 package MetaQuotes publishes an official MetaTrader5 Python package (Windows-only wheels). It connects to an MT5 terminal running on the same machine and sends orders through order_send(). Pair it with a Flask endpoint and you have a complete bridge in about 40 lines: from flask import Flask, request import MetaTrader5 as mt5 app Flask(__name__) mt5.initialize() # attaches to the MT5 terminal already logged in on this Windows box @app.route("/webhook", methods) def webhook(): d request.get_json(forceTrue) symbol d tick mt5.symbol_info_tick(symbol) is_buy d "buy" order { "action": mt5.TRADE_ACTION_DEAL, "symbol": symbol, "volume": 0.10, "type": mt5.ORDER_TYPE_BUY if is_buy else mt5.ORDER_TYPE_SELL, "price": tick.ask if is_buy else tick.bid, "deviation": 20, "magic": 202607, "comment": "tv-bridge", "type_filling": mt5.ORDER_FILLING_IOC, } result mt5.order_send(order) return {"retcode": result.retcode}, 200 if __name__ "__main__": app.run(host"0.0.0.0", port5000) Install with pip install MetaTrader5 flask. Because TradingView must reach your server over the public internet on port 80/443, host this on a VPS with a domain and SSL, or tunnel your local machine with ngrok. Note the MetaTrader5 package only runs on Windows and needs the terminal logged in on the same box. MQL5 Expert Advisor (polling or socket) The alternative keeps everything inside MetaTrader. An MQL5 EA runs on your chart, polls your server every few hundred milliseconds for new signals, and calls MT5's native trade functions when one arrives. This drops the Python dependency and is my usual choice when a client wants the whole stack on one VPS with no external process to babysit. More code, but you own every millisecond of it. This DIY path is exactly what I deliver on my MT4/MT5 automation service — a webhook-to-broker architecture built and tested against your specific strategy, with symbol mapping, risk sizing and a kill switch baked in. If you'd rather build the Pine side yourself, my Pine Script development page covers how I code signal-ready strategies. Method 3 — Commercial bridge/copier EA (TradingConnector) The middle ground: a paid, self-hosted EA that listens for the webhook locally, so no third-party cloud ever sees your signals. TradingConnector is the established option here — "serverless" in that the EA (or a Chrome extension) receives the alert directly and executes with sub-second latency. It now also routes to Interactive Brokers TWS alongside MT4/MT5. Pricing as of July 2026: Single MetaTrader — $14.99/month or $149/year (7-day free trial). Multiple MetaTraders (same PC or remote) — $49.99/month or $499/year. White-glove setups — $299/month or $2,999/year. You get unlimited alerts and symbols plus full order features — stop-loss, take-profit, pending orders, breakeven, trailing stop, trade modification and dynamic lot sizing. Because it runs on your own machine, it's the privacy-friendly choice, and the flat monthly fee undercuts most cloud bridges — the trade-off is that you maintain the local process yourself. For a broader look at standalone MT5 automation tools beyond bridges, see my piece on MT5 tools like FxSpire and Parabolic Trader. This is the same webhook-to-broker pattern I use for other platforms too — see how the identical architecture routes into a US broker in my TradingView to Interactive Brokers guide. The three methods compared MethodCodingCost (2026)LatencyControl / privacyBest for Managed cloud bridge (PineConnector)None$26–$106/mo (annual)<1s typicalLow — via vendor cloudNon-coders who want it live today DIY webhook server (Python / MQL5 EA)HighVPS only (~$10–30/mo)Your infrastructureFull — you host itDevelopers avoiding per-account fees Commercial bridge EA (TradingConnector)Low$14.99/mo or $149/yr<1s (local)Medium — self-hostedPrivacy plus a flat fee Which should you pick? Pick the managed bridge if you don't code and want trades flowing today — the fee buys you symbol mapping, analytics and support you'd otherwise build yourself. Pick the DIY Python/EA server if you're a developer, run multiple accounts where per-account fees add up, or need custom logic (session filters, scaling, prop-firm rules) that off-the-shelf tools don't expose. Pick a commercial EA like TradingConnector when you want a flat fee and don't want signals leaving your machine. Whichever you choose, paper-trade the full round trip first, use bar-close alerts, and keep a manual kill switch — automation executes your logic without hesitation, including your mistakes. FAQ Can TradingView connect directly to MT5? No. MT5 has no inbound webhook, so you always need a bridge in between — a managed service like PineConnector, your own Python/EA webhook server, or a commercial bridge EA. TradingView's alert simply POSTs to that bridge, which then places the MT5 order. Which TradingView plan do I need for an MT5 bridge? Any paid plan. Webhook alerts start on the Essential tier (about $14.95/month billed annually) and are included on every plan above it. The free Basic plan can't send webhooks, and you must also enable two-factor authentication. Is PineConnector or a DIY bridge cheaper? Over time, a DIY Python/MQL5 bridge is cheaper — you pay only for a VPS (roughly $10–30/month) instead of $26–$106/month. But it costs you build and maintenance time. For one or two accounts with no coding, PineConnector or TradingConnector is usually the better value. Do I need a VPS to run a TradingView-to-MT5 bridge? Practically, yes. MT5 and any DIY server or EA must stay running to receive signals, so a Windows VPS keeps it live 24/5. Even with a cloud bridge like PineConnector, your MetaTrader terminal still has to run somewhere. How fast are TradingView-to-MT5 fills? Well-built bridges typically deliver sub-second end-to-end latency. PineConnector reports under one second (server ~16ms, network ~131ms, EA processing 100–200ms, broker 1–100ms). A VPS located near your broker's servers tightens this further. Get it built right Want your TradingView strategy executing on MT4/MT5 reliably — with the symbol mapping and risk controls that keep it from silently failing? WhatsApp me at +91 77352 68199 with your strategy and broker, and I'll scope the fastest, cheapest path for your setup. Risk disclaimer: Trading forex, CFDs, futures and other leveraged instruments carries a substantial risk of loss and is not suitable for every investor. Automated and bridged systems can and do lose money, and backtested or past performance does not guarantee future results. Tool names, pricing and plan requirements were verified against official sources in July 2026 but can change — always confirm current details directly with each provider. Nothing here is financial advice; consult a licensed professional before trading live capital.

TradingView to MT4/MT5 Bridge: 3 Working Methods (2026)

Jayadev Rana